How porcess we sflection if the sample Sample selection process are Sample selection process least reasonably close Sampke the population parameters? Search for:. Why Is a Simple ASmple Sample Simple? Sample selection process cases where Sajple purpose of the research is to define what is typical or normal, the sampling would need to be more comprehensive. In two-stage cluster sampling, a selection of individuals from each cluster is then randomly selected for inclusion. Because individuals who make up the subset of the larger group are chosen at random, each individual in the large population set has the same probability of being selected.

Video

How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research - Sampling Methods in Research Methodology

Sample selection process -

Simple random sampling involves randomly selecting respondents from a sampling frame, but with large sampling frames, usually a table of random numbers or a computerized random number generator is used. Next, you sort the list in increasing order of their corresponding random number, and select the first clients on that sorted list.

This is the simplest of all probability sampling techniques; however, the simplicity is also the strength of this technique. Because the sampling frame is not subdivided or partitioned, the sample is unbiased and the inferences are most generalizable amongst all probability sampling techniques.

Systematic sampling. In this technique, the sampling frame is ordered according to some criteria and elements are selected at regular intervals through that ordered list. It is important that the starting point is not automatically the first in the list, but is instead randomly chosen from within the first k elements on the list.

In our previous example of selecting firms from a list of firms, you can sort the firms in increasing or decreasing order of their size i. This process will ensure that there is no overrepresentation of large or small firms in your sample, but rather that firms of all sizes are generally uniformly represented, as it is in your sampling frame.

In other words, the sample is representative of the population, at least on the basis of the sorting criterion. Stratified sampling. In the previous example of selecting firms from a list of firms, you can start by categorizing the firms based on their size as large more than employees , medium between 50 and employees , and small less than 50 employees.

You can then randomly select 67 firms from each subgroup to make up your sample of firms. However, since there are many more small firms in a sampling frame than large firms, having an equal number of small, medium, and large firms will make the sample less representative of the population i.

This is called non-proportional stratified sampling because the proportion of sample within each subgroup does not reflect the proportions in the sampling frame or the population of interest , and the smaller subgroup large-sized firms is over-sampled.

An alternative technique will be to select subgroup samples in proportion to their size in the population. In this case, the proportional distribution of firms in the population is retained in the sample, and hence this technique is called proportional stratified sampling.

Cluster sampling. If you have a population dispersed over a wide geographic region, it may not be feasible to conduct a simple random sampling of the entire population. For instance, if you wish to sample city governments in the state of New York, rather than travel all over the state to interview key city officials as you may have to do with a simple random sample , you can cluster these governments based on their counties, randomly select a set of three counties, and then interview officials from every official in those counties.

However, depending on between- cluster differences, the variability of sample estimates in a cluster sample will generally be higher than that of a simple random sample, and hence the results are less generalizable to the population than those obtained from simple random samples.

Matched-pairs sampling. Sometimes, researchers may want to compare two subgroups within one population based on a specific criterion. For instance, why are some firms consistently more profitable than other firms? Now, you have two matched samples of high-profitability and low-profitability firms that you can study in greater detail.

Such matched-pairs sampling technique is often an ideal way of understanding bipolar differences between different subgroups within a given population. Multi-stage sampling. The probability sampling techniques described previously are all examples of single-stage sampling techniques.

Depending on your sampling needs, you may combine these single-stage techniques to conduct multi-stage sampling. For instance, you can stratify a list of businesses based on firm size, and then conduct systematic sampling within each stratum.

This is a two-stage combination of stratified and systematic sampling. Likewise, you can start with a cluster of school districts in the state of New York, and within each cluster, select a simple random sample of schools; within each school, select a simple random sample of grade levels; and within each grade level, select a simple random sample of students for study.

In this case, you have a four-stage sampling process consisting of cluster and simple random sampling. Nonprobability sampling is a sampling technique in which some units of the population have zero chance of selection or where the probability of selection cannot be accurately determined.

Typically, units are selected based on certain non-random criteria, such as quota or convenience. Because selection is non-random, nonprobability sampling does not allow the estimation of sampling errors, and may be subjected to a sampling bias.

Therefore, information from a sample cannot be generalized back to the population. Types of non-probability sampling techniques include:. Convenience sampling. Also called accidental or opportunity sampling, this is a technique in which a sample is drawn from that part of the population that is close to hand, readily available, or convenient.

For instance, if you stand outside a shopping center and hand out questionnaire surveys to people or interview them as they walk in, the sample of respondents you will obtain will be a convenience sample.

This is a non-probability sample because you are systematically excluding all people who shop at other shopping centers. The opinions that you would get from your chosen sample may reflect the unique characteristics of this shopping center such as the nature of its stores e.

Hence, the scientific generalizability of such observations will be very limited. Other examples of convenience sampling are sampling students registered in a certain class or sampling patients arriving at a certain medical clinic. As the name suggests, with this method, participants are selected based on their availability or accessibility.

In other words, the sample is selected based on how convenient it is for the researcher to access it, as opposed to using a defined and objective process. Naturally, convenience sampling provides a quick and easy way to gather data, as the sample is selected based on the individuals who are readily available or willing to participate.

Last but not least, we have the snowball sampling method. This method relies on referrals from initial participants to recruit additional participants. In other words, the initial subjects form the first small snowball and each additional subject recruited through referral is added to the snowball, making it larger as it rolls along.

For example, people with a rare medical condition or members of an exclusive group. Simply put, snowball sampling is ideal for research that involves reaching hard-to-access populations.

So, make sure that it aligns with your research aims and questions before adopting this method. As with all research design and methodology choices, your sampling approach needs to be guided by and aligned with your research aims, objectives and research questions — in other words, your golden thread.

Typically, quantitative studies lean toward the former, while qualitative studies aim for the latter, so be sure to consider your broader methodology as well. The second factor you need to consider is your resources and, more generally, the practical constraints at play.

If, for example, you have easy, free access to a large sample at your workplace or university and a healthy budget to help you attract participants, that will open up multiple options in terms of sampling methods. Last but not least, if you need hands-on help with your sampling or any other aspect of your research , take a look at our 1-on-1 coaching service , where we guide you through each step of the research process, at your own pace.

This post is part of our dissertation mini-course, which covers everything you need to get started with your dissertation, thesis or research project. Excellent and helpful. Best site to get a full understanding of Research methodology.

Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

The two overarching approaches Simple random sampling Stratified random sampling Cluster sampling Systematic sampling Purposive sampling Convenience sampling Snowball sampling How to choose the right sampling method.

What exactly is sampling? The two overarching sampling approaches At the highest level, there are two approaches to sampling: probability sampling and non-probability sampling. Need a helping hand? Book An Initial Consultation. Simple random sampling Simple random sampling involves selecting participants in a completely random fashion , where each participant has an equal chance of being selected.

Stratified random sampling Stratified random sampling is similar to simple random sampling, but it kicks things up a notch. These might be pre-existing groups, such as people in certain zip codes or students belonging to an academic year. Cluster sampling can be done by selecting the entire cluster, or in the case of two-stage cluster sampling, by randomly selecting the cluster itself, then selecting at random again within the cluster.

Pros: Cluster sampling is economically beneficial and logistically easier when dealing with vast and geographically dispersed populations.

Cons: Due to potential similarities within clusters, this method can introduce a greater sampling error compared to other methods.

Here are some forms of non-probability sampling and how they work. People or elements in a sample are selected on the basis of their accessibility and availability. If you are doing a research survey and you work at a university, for example, a convenience sample might consist of students or co-workers who happen to be on campus with open schedules who are willing to take your questionnaire.

Pros: Convenience sampling is the most straightforward method, requiring minimal planning, making it quick to implement.

Cons: Due to its non-random nature, the method is highly susceptible to biases, and the results are often lacking in their application to the real world. Like the probability-based stratified sampling method, this approach aims to achieve a spread across the target population by specifying who should be recruited for a survey according to certain groups or criteria.

For example, your quota might include a certain number of males and a certain number of females. Alternatively, you might want your samples to be at a specific income level or in certain age brackets or ethnic groups.

Participants for the sample are chosen consciously by researchers based on their knowledge and understanding of the research question at hand or their goals. Also known as judgment sampling, this technique is unlikely to result in a representative sample , but it is a quick and fairly easy way to get a range of results or responses.

Pros: Purposive sampling targets specific criteria or characteristics, making it ideal for studies that require specialized participants or specific conditions. With this approach, people recruited to be part of a sample are asked to invite those they know to take part, who are then asked to invite their friends and family and so on.

The participation radiates through a community of connected individuals like a snowball rolling downhill. Pros: Especially useful for hard-to-reach or secretive populations, snowball sampling is effective for certain niche studies.

Cons: The method can introduce bias due to the reliance on participant referrals, and the choice of initial seeds can significantly influence the final sample.

Choosing the right sampling method is a pivotal aspect of any research process, but it can be a stumbling block for many. If you aim to get a general sense of a larger group, simple random or stratified sampling could be your best bet.

For focused insights or studying unique communities, snowball or purposive sampling might be more suitable. For a diverse group with different categories, stratified sampling can ensure all segments are covered. Your available time, budget and ease of accessing participants matter. Convenience or quota sampling can be practical for quicker studies, but they come with some trade-offs.

If reaching everyone in your desired group is challenging, snowball or purposive sampling can be more feasible. Decide if you want your findings to represent a much broader group. For a wider representation, methods that include everyone fairly like probability sampling are a good option.

For specialized insights into specific groups, non-probability sampling methods can be more suitable. Before fully committing, discuss your chosen method with others in your field and consider a test run.

Using a sample is a kind of short-cut. How much accuracy you lose out on depends on how well you control for sampling error, non-sampling error, and bias in your survey design. Our blog post helps you to steer clear of some of these issues. To use it, you need to know your:.

If any of those terms are unfamiliar, have a look at our blog post on determining sample size for details of what they mean and how to find them. In the ever-evolving business landscape, relying on the most recent market research is paramount.

Home Market Rpocess. Sampling is an economical food choices part of any research project. Selectlon ABOUT: Selectioon Process Steps. Sampling is Sample selection process technique procezs selecting individual members or a subset of the population to make statistical inferences from them and estimate the characteristics of the whole population. Different sampling methods are widely used by researchers in market research so that they do not need to research the entire population to collect actionable insights. Tools Sampoe Settings. Sample selection process and Sample products for review. As previously seleection, there are many reasons why you would selectioh a sample Sample selection process than a census when conducting research. Sample selection process as mentioned, there are many things that could go wrong. One of the things that could go wrong is the selection of a sample. The primary goal of sampling is to create a representative sample, one in which the smaller group sample accurately represents the characteristics of the larger group population. If the sample is well selected, the sample will be generalizable to the population.